Investigation of Mechanical Behavior, Plastic Shrinkage, and Microstructure of Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete and The Effects of Single-Component and Two-Component Fibers
Keywords:
Self-compacting geopolymer concrete, steel and polypropylene fibers, drying shrinkage, artificial intelligence modelingAbstract
Substituting aluminosilicate pozzolans for cement offers a stable and environmentally sustainable mixture. The primary innovation lies in incorporating polypropylene and steel fibers into self-compacting mixtures to enhance mechanical properties and durability, coupled with artificial intelligence modeling (artificial neural networks and decision trees) for compressive strength prediction. This integrated experimental and computational methodology enables more precise optimization of mix designs.The methodology involved producing 16 mix designs with alkaline concentrations of 8 and 12 M, variations in pozzolan quantities, and fiber volumes (0.5 to 1% by volume). Samples underwent ambient and heat curing, with evaluations of fresh properties (slump flow, L-box, V-funnel), mechanical properties (compressive and tensile strength), water absorption, shrinkage, and microstructure (SEM and XRD). Modeling was performed using experimental data to predict compressive strength. Results indicated that increasing molarity from 8 to 12 densifies the concrete microstructure, boosting compressive strength by up to 25% (from 40 to 96.83 MPa at 28 days), although alkaline solution costs may rise. Steel fibers, by forming resilient internal networks, improved tensile and flexural strength by up to 30% and reduced drying shrinkage by 11% . Hybrid fiber combinations enhanced high-temperature durability, retaining 80% strength at 600°C. The AI models achieved accuracies exceeding 88% , positioning this concrete as a sustainable and efficient alternative to Portland cement concrete.
References
Al-Awsh, W. A., Baghabra Al-Amoudi, O. S., Al-Osta, M. A., Ahmad, A., & Saleh, T. A. (2021). Experimental assessment of the thermal and mechanical performance of insulated concrete blocks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283, 124624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124624
Bouaissi, A., Li, L. Y., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., & Bui, Q. B. (2019). Mechanical properties and microstructure analysis of FA-GGBS-HMNS based geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 210, 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.202
Chottemada, P. G., Kar, A., Mishra, A., Uppala, J. S., Singal, R., & Rane, S. (2023). Mechanical Properties and Life Cycle Assessment of Steel and Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Alkali Activated Concrete. Structural Engineering Convention, Singapore.
Davidovits, J. (1991). Geopolymers: Inorganic Polymeric New Materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 37, 1633-1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01912193
Davidovits, J. (1994). Global Warming Impact on the Cement and Aggregates Industries. World Resource Review, 6(2), 263-278. https://www.geopolymer.org/wp-content/uploads/5GWPROCE.pdf
Duxson, P., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., & Van Deventer, J. S. J. (2007). The Role of Inorganic Polymer Technology in the Development of Green Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 37(12), 1590-1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018
Gencel, F. K., Sahin, M., Durgun, M. Y., Hagg Lobland, H. E., & Brostow, W. (2013). modeling of thermal conductivity of concrete with vermiculite by using artificial neural networks approaches. Experimental Heat Transfer, 26, 360-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/08916152.2012.669810
Hardjito, D., Wallah, S. E., Sumajouw, D. M. J., & Rangan, B. V. (2004). On the Development of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 101(6), 467-472. https://doi.org/10.14359/13485
Hiorns, C., & Boucher, A. J. (2012). A Brief guide to polymer nomenclature. Roger. https://iupac.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/140-Brief-Guide-to-Polymer-Nomenclature-Web-Final-d.pdf
JiZhuang, H. Z. H. Y., & Xu, H. (2017). Resistance of geopolymer mortar to acid and chloride attacks. Procedia Engineering, 210, 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.057
Karatas, M., Benli, A., & Toprak, H. A. (2019). Effect of incorporation of raw vermiculite as partial sand replacement on the properties of self-compacting mortars at elevated temperature. Construction and Building Materials, 221, 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.077
Madhavi, T. C., & Rameshwaran, P. (2020). Geopolymer concrete - The eco friendly alternate to concrete. NBM and CW infra construction and equipment magazine. https://www.nbmcw.com/product-technology/construction-chemicals-waterproofing/concrete-admixtures/geopolymer-concrete-the-eco-friendly-alternate-to-concrete.html
Meshram, R. B., & Kumar, S. (2022). Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of geopolymer cement manufacturing with Portland cement in Indian context. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(6), 4791-4802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03336-9
Moradikhou, A. B., Safehian, M., & Golafshani, E. M. (2023). High-strength geopolymer concrete based on coal washing waste. Construction and Building Materials, 362, 129675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129675
Qin, Y., Zhang, X., Chai, J., Xu, Z., & Li, S. (2019). Experimental study of compressive behavior of polypropylene-fiber-reinforced and polypropylene-fiber-fabric-reinforced concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 194, 216-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.042
Schackow, A., Effting, C., Folgueras, M. V., Güths, S., & Mendes, G. A. (2014). Mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight concretes with vermiculite and EPS using air-entraining agent. Construction and Building Materials, 57, 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.009
Singh, B., Ishwarya, G., Gupta, M., & Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2015). Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Construction and Building Materials, 85, 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036
Singh, N. B., Saxena, S. K., & Kumar, M. (2018). Effect of nanomaterials on the properties of geopolymer mortars and concrete. Materials today proceeding, 5(1), 9035-9040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.10.018
Tang, W., Pignatta, G., & Sepasgozar, S. M. (2021). Life-cycle assessment of fly ash and cenosphere-based geopolymer material. Sustainability, 13(20), 11167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011167
Ustaoglu, A., Kurtoglu, K., Gencel, O., & Kocyigit, F. (2020). Impact of a low thermal conductive lightweight concrete in building: Energy and fuel performance evaluation for different climate region. Journal of Environmental Management, 268, 110732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110732
Xu, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Deng, Q., Xue, Z., Huang, G., & Huang, X. (2024). Influence of steel slag and steel fiber on the mechanical properties, durability, and life cycle assessment of ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 441, 137590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137590
Zhang, Y. H., Wang, H., Zhong, W. L., & Fan, L. F. (2024). Development of a high-strength lightweight geopolymer concrete for structural and thermal insulation applications. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 21, e03949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03949
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meysam Rostami, Vahid Rostami, Ali Reza Lork (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
