The Impact of Geopolitical Risk on Renewable Energy Innovation in OECD Countries

Authors

  • Mohammad Reza Farrokhi Master student in Energy Economics, Department of Energy Economics, Faculty of Economics, Kharazmi University of Tehran, Iran https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0735-4483
  • Mohammad Javad Kordani Master student in Business Administration, Department of human resource management and organizational behavior, Faculty of Management, Tehran University, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0732-6061
  • Hossein Karimi Master student in Economics, Department of Housing Economics, Faculty of Economics, Kharazmi University of Tehran, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0676-4968

Keywords:

Geopolitical Risk, Renewable Energy Innovation, OECD Countries, Energy Security, Technological Innovation, Panel Data, Renewable Energy Patents

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of geopolitical risk on renewable energy innovation in OECD countries during 2000–2022. This quantitative longitudinal study employed a balanced panel-data design covering 25 OECD countries over 23 years, yielding 575 country-year observations. Renewable energy innovation was measured using patent-based indicators, while geopolitical risk was assessed using the country-specific Geopolitical Risk Index. Macroeconomic and structural control variables included real GDP per capita, research and development expenditure, trade openness, renewable energy share, CO₂ emissions per capita, and population. The data were analyzed using descriptive and panel diagnostic procedures, two-way fixed-effects regression, lagged specifications, Driscoll–Kraay robust standard errors, and dynamic system generalized method of moments estimation. Robustness analyses were also conducted using alternative measures, exclusion of extreme observations, and alternative model specifications. Geopolitical risk had a positive and statistically significant effect on renewable energy innovation in the fully adjusted fixed-effects model, B = 0.169, SE = 0.059, p = .005. The one-year-lagged effect was stronger, B = 0.207, SE = 0.064, p = .001, while the two-year-lagged effect also remained significant, B = 0.121, SE = 0.059, p = .041. In the dynamic system-GMM model, lagged geopolitical risk continued to positively predict renewable energy innovation, B = 0.154, SE = 0.058, p = .008, after controlling for innovation persistence. GDP per capita, R&D expenditure, and renewable energy share also showed significant positive effects, whereas CO₂ emissions per capita had a significant negative effect. The positive geopolitical-risk effect remained stable across all robustness specifications. The findings indicate that geopolitical risk can act as a stimulus for renewable energy innovation in OECD countries, particularly with a short temporal delay, suggesting that geopolitical uncertainty may strengthen incentives for technological development aimed at improving energy security, diversification, and strategic autonomy.

References

Ahmed, S. (2025). The geopolitics of energy: How oil and gas shape diplomacy. Modern Diplomacy.

Akadiri, S., & Özkan, O. (2025). Energy Markets, Geopolitical Risks, and Global Trade: A High-Stakes Tug of War. Geological Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.70026

Alsagr, N., & van Hemmen, S. (2021). The impact of financial development and geopolitical risk on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from emerging markets. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 25906-25919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12447-2

Blondeel, M., Bradshaw, M., Bridge, G., & Kuzemko, C. (2021). The Geopolitics of Energy System Transformation: A Review. Geography Compass.

Cheikh, N. B., & Zaied, Y. B. (2023). Investigating the dynamics of crude oil and clean energy markets in times of geopolitical tensions. Energy Economics, 124, 106861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106861

Desing, R. (2021). Geopolitics of Energy and the Rise of Alternative Financial Systems. Energy Policy, 150, 112-130.

Flouros, F., Pistikou, V., & Plakandaras, V. (2022). Geopolitical Risk as a Determinant of Renewable Energy Investments. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041498

Goldthau, A., & Youngs, R. (2023). The EU Energy Crisis and a New Geopolitics of Climate Transition. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(1), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13539

Gurbanov, Y. (2024). Geopolitics and Energy Diplomacy in the Caspian Region. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839472934

Haghbin, A., & Ansari, M. (2024). Consequences of the Russia-Ukraine War in the Energy Sector and Iran's Geopolitical Importance. Central Asia Studies Quarterly(125).

Ibekwe, K. I., Etukudoh, E. A., Nwokediegwu, Z. Q. S., Umoh, A. A., Adefemi, A., & Ilojianya, V. I. (2024). Energy Security in the Global Context: A Comprehensive Review of Geopolitical Dynamics and Policies. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(1), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i1.741

Jiao, J. W., Yin, J. P., Xu, P. F., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2023). Transmission mechanisms of geopolitical risks to the crude oil market--A pioneering two-stage geopolitical risk analysis approach. Energy, 283, 128449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128449

Kamalov, K. (2025). Terrorism and Oil Geopolitics: Shifts in World Energy Policy. American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research, 5(8), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/volume05issue08-13

Konashlu, N., Najafi, & Lotfi. (2022). Analysis and Study of Iran’s Geopolitical Position in Energy Transfer Plans from the Caspian Sea in Line with its Impact on the Geo-economic Development of Central Asia and the Caucasus. Geography Quarterly (Regional Planning), 12(46), 848-879.

La Camera, F. (2025). The powerful role in geopolitics is to manage the energy transition.

Norouzizadeh, F., Goodarzi, M., & Masoudnia, H. (2022). The Role of the Geopolitics and Geoeconomics of Persian Gulf Energy Transit (Oil and Gas) in Advancing the Regional Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. International Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(3), 228-255.

Omidi, A., & Orhon Ozdag, H. (2023). Analyzing the mutual geopolitical and security complementarity of Iran and Turkey: Border, energy, and water. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 25(5), 923-943.

Pantel, K. (2024). A review on the nexus between energy industry, financial markets, environmental concerns, and geopolitics.

Patidar, A. K., Jain, P., Dhasmana, P., & Choudhury, T. (2024). Impact of global events on crude oil economy: a comprehensive review of the geopolitics of energy and economic polarization. Geojournal, 89(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11054-1

Pradhan, R. (2020). Energy Geopolitics and Pipeline Diplomacy in Central Asia: India’s Interests and Policy Options. Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, 24(2), 216-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973598420943434

Qin, Y., Hong, K., Chen, J., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Asymmetric effects of geopolitical risks on energy returns and volatility under different market conditions. Energy Economics, 90, 104851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104851

Sarker, P. K., Bouri, E., & Marco, C. K. L. (2023). Asymmetric effects of climate policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and crude oil prices on clean energy prices. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), 15797-15807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23020-w

Shen, H., Liang, Y., Li, H., Liu, J., & Lu, G. (2021). Does geopolitical risk promote mergers and acquisitions of listed companies in energy and electric power industries. Energy Economics, 95, 105115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105115

Shokri, U. (2025). Geopolitics and Aspirations for Sustainability: Turkey's Emergence as an Energy Hub. Middle East Policy, 33(1), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.70022

Skalamera, M. (2023). The Geopolitics of Energy after the Invasion of Ukraine. The Washington Quarterly, 46(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2023.2190632

Vakulchuk, R., Overland, I., & Scholten, D. (2020). Renewable energy and geopolitics: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 122, 109547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109547

Wang, Q., Zhang, C., & Li, R. (2024). Impact of different geopolitical factors on the energy transition: The role of geopolitical threats, geopolitical acts, and geopolitical risks. Journal of Environmental Management, 352, 119962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119962

Xiao, J., Wen, F., & He, Z. (2023). Impact of geopolitical risks on investor attention and speculation in the oil market: Evidence from nonlinear and time-varying analysis. Energy, 267, 126564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126564

Yang, T., Fang, S., Du, A. M., & Du, Q. (2024). Navigating the nexus: geopolitical risk, fossil energy prices, and European utility stock returns - implications for environmental management and energy security in a conflict-ridden global landscape. Journal of Environmental Management, 352, Article 12008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120086

Zhang, J., & Liu, X.-f. (2025). Sustainable Development at the Crossroads: Geopolitical Risks, Natural Resource Scarcity, and Renewable Energy in Energy Security Transitions. Geoscience Frontiers, 16(5), 102129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102129

Zhang, Q., Yang, K., Hu, Y., Jiao, J., & Wang, S. (2023). Unveiling the Impact of Geopolitical Conflict on Oil Prices: A Case Study of the Russia-Ukraine War and Its Channels. Energy Economics, 126, 106956.

Zhao, D., Chaudhry, M. O., Ayub, B., Waqas, M., & Ullah, I. (2024). Modeling the Nexus between geopolitical risk, oil price volatility and renewable energy investment; evidence from Chinese listed firms. Renewable Energy, 225, 120309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120309

Zomorodi Anbaji, Z., & Haji-Yousefi, A. M. (2021). Geopolitics of energy and Russian military involvement in Syria. Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(61), 116-144.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Farrokhi, M. R., Kordani, M. J. ., & Karimi, H. . (2027). The Impact of Geopolitical Risk on Renewable Energy Innovation in OECD Countries. Journal of Resource Management and Decision Engineering, 1-20. https://journalrmde.com/index.php/jrmde/article/view/427