Analysis of Drivers and Barriers to Sustainable Renewable Energy Transition in Iran Using the Multi-Level Perspective Approach
Keywords:
Energy transition, Renewable energy, Multi-level perspective, Sustainable development, Drivers and barriers, IranAbstract
The transition to renewable energy has emerged as a key priority for energy systems worldwide due to its critical role in achieving sustainable development, enhancing energy security, and mitigating the impacts of climate change. Despite Iran’s considerable potential in renewable energy resources, the development of these resources faces numerous challenges. This study aims to identify and analyze the key drivers and barriers influencing the transition to renewable energy in Iran using the multi-level perspective (MLP) approach. In this regard, after extracting relevant data, the factors affecting energy transition were categorized across three analytical levels of landscape, regime, and niche, and their roles as either drivers or barriers were examined. The findings identified 58 influential factors affecting the energy transition in Iran, including 20, 22, and 16 factors at the landscape, regime, and niche levels, respectively. The results showed that landscape-level factors, such as climate change, global decarbonization trends, energy security concerns, and international pressures, mainly act as external drivers creating momentum for the transition. At the regime level, structural barriers, including fossil fuel dependence, energy subsidies, weak financing mechanisms, institutional fragmentation, regulatory instability, and infrastructure limitations, were found to significantly constrain the diffusion of renewable energy. The niche level represented major transformative capacities through renewable energy technologies, research and development activities, knowledge-based companies, pilot projects, and technological innovation capabilities. However, these capacities remain limited by financial constraints and weaknesses in the technological supply chain. Furthermore, the findings demonstrated that the identified factors affect multiple sustainability dimensions, including economic, environmental, social, technological, and institutional and policy aspects.
References
Aghlimoghadam, H. (2025). Institutional Barriers to Energy Transition in Iran: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 121, 103985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103985
Bakhuis, J., Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2024). Comparing Analytical Frameworks for Sustainability Transitions: Integrating the Multi-Level Perspective, Technological Innovation Systems, and Transition Governance. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 50, 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100822
Geels, F. W. (2017). Sociotechnical Transitions to Sustainability. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss077.pub2
Geels, F. W. (2020). Micro-Foundations of the Multi-Level Perspective on Socio-Technical Transitions: Developing a Multi-Dimensional Model of Agency Through Crossovers Between Social Constructivism, Evolutionary Economics and Neo-Institutional Theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119894
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
Heydari, M. (2022). SWOT Analysis of Solar Energy Use in Desert Areas of Iran. Journal of Sustainable Energy Systems, 1(2), 161-173.
Kanger, L., Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., & Schot, J. (2019). Technological Diffusion as a Process of Societal Embedding: Lessons from Historical Automobile Transitions for Future Electric Mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 71, 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.012
Kern, F. (2012). Using the Multi-Level Perspective on Socio-Technical Transitions to Assess Innovation Policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(2), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.004
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., & Wells, P. (2019). An Agenda for Sustainability Transitions Research: State of the Art and Future Directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
Markard, J., & Rosenbloom, D. (2023). Phases of the Net-Zero Energy Transition and Strategies to Achieve It. In K. Araújo (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Energy Transitions. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003183020-8
Mousavi Darcheh, S., Khosravi, A., & Malekpour, A. (2018). Challenges of Renewable Energy Development in Iran: A Technological and Policy Perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.018
Ordu, M., Yaghoubi, H., & Mahmoudi, H. (2021). Strategic Assessment of Renewable Energy Development in Iran Using SWOT Analysis. Renewable Energy, 179, 1252-1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.089
Rahmani, H., Naghizadeh, A., & Zarghami, M. (2022). Transition Pathways and Policy Failures in Iran's Wind Turbine Innovation System. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 122021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122021
Salimi, M., Hosseinpour, M., & Dodange, B. (2023). Investigating the Importance of Renewable Energy in the Successful Energy Transition in Iran Based on SWOT Analysis. Journal of Renewable and New Energy, 10(1), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.52547/jrenew.10.1.97
Verbong, G. P. J., & Geels, F. W. (2007). The Ongoing Energy Transition: Lessons from a Socio-Technical, Multi-Level Analysis of the Dutch Electricity System (1960-2004). Energy Policy, 35(2), 1025-1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.010
Weckowska, D., Weiss, D., Schwäbe, C., & Dreher, C. (2025). Technological Innovation System Analyses and Sustainability Transitions: A Literature Review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 54, 100935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100935
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anahita Sadeghi Sabour (Author); Aliyeh Kazemi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

