Integrated Queue Management and Service Composition for Enhancing Manufacturing-as-a-Service Performance

Authors

    Mina Ravanesh * PHD candidate of industrial engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran m.ravanesh@email.kntu.ac.ir
    Emad Roghanian Associate Professor of industrial engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Manufacturing-as-a-Service, Queue Management, Service Composition, Service-Oriented Manufacturing

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and empirically evaluate an integrated framework examining the effects of integrated queue management and service composition capability on Manufacturing-as-a-Service (MaaS) performance, while assessing the enabling role of technological support factors within service-oriented manufacturing environments. This applied quantitative study employed a descriptive-correlational design using structural equation modeling. The statistical population consisted of manufacturing managers, industrial engineers, production planners, and digital manufacturing specialists working in manufacturing organizations in Tehran, Iran. A total of 384 participants were selected through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire measuring integrated queue management, service composition capability, technological support factors, and MaaS performance. Content validity was confirmed by an expert panel, while construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was established using Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability, and average variance extracted indicators. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 27 and SmartPLS 4. The measurement model demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.887 to 0.925, composite reliability values between 0.909 and 0.938, and average variance extracted values exceeding 0.50 for all constructs. Structural equation modeling revealed that integrated queue management had a significant positive effect on MaaS performance (β = 0.421, t = 8.974, p < 0.001). Service composition capability also exerted a significant positive effect on MaaS performance (β = 0.366, t = 7.852, p < 0.001). Technological support factors significantly influenced MaaS performance directly (β = 0.214, t = 4.986, p < 0.001) and indirectly through their effects on integrated queue management (β = 0.492, t = 9.843, p < 0.001) and service composition capability (β = 0.547, t = 11.308, p < 0.001). The proposed model explained 68.7% of the variance in MaaS performance (R² = 0.687), indicating substantial explanatory power and predictive relevance. The findings demonstrate that integrated queue management and service composition capability are critical drivers of Manufacturing-as-a-Service performance, while technological support factors provide the essential infrastructure enabling their effectiveness.

References

Agarwal, S. (2025). Dynamic Function Configuration and Its Management in Serverless Computing: A Taxonomy and Future Directions. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.02404

Ahmadvand, M., Pajnič, R., & Chiu, C.-L. (2026). Push0: Scalable and Fault-Tolerant Orchestration for Zero-Knowledge Proof Generation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2602.16338

Arafat, J. (2025). Next-Generation Event-Driven Architectures: Performance, Scalability, and Intelligent Orchestration Across Messaging Frameworks. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.04404

Bernard, T. (2025). Sugar Shack 4.0: Practical Demonstration of an IIoT-Based Event-Driven Automation System. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.15708

Dobaj, J., Riel, A., Macher, G., & Egretzberger, M. (2023). Towards DevOps for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs): Resilient Self-Adaptive Software for Sustainable Human-Centric Smart CPS Facilitated by Digital Twins. Machines, 11(10), 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11100973

Garcia-Alonso, J. (2025). Rethinking Services in the Quantum Age: The SOQ Paradigm. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.03890

Gravara, M., Herrera, J. L., & Nastic, S. (2026). Compass: Optimizing Compound AI Workflows for Dynamic Adaptation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2603.20821

Guru, D., Chinnaiah, B., & Subramaniam, S. (2026). Building a Modular and Fault-Tolerant Trading System. International Journal of Software Innovation, 14(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsi.398844

He, Q., Zhang, F., Bian, G., Zhang, W., & Li, Z. (2025). Research of Key Technologies of Distributed Stream Processing Based on FaaS. Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience, 37(23-24). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.70274

Horstmann, A., Riggs, S., Chaban, Y., Clare, D. K., Freitas, G. d., Farmer, D. A., Howe, A., Morris, K. L., & Hatton, D. (2024). A Service-Based Approach to cryoEM Facility Processing Pipelines at eBIC. Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology, 80(3), 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1107/s2059798324000986

Jani, Y., & Jani, A. (2024). Robust Framework for Scalable AI Inference Using Distributed Cloud Services and Event-Driven Architecture. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4909036/v1

Jiang, Z., Xing, Z., Lu, J., Niu, Y., Sang, Q., Zhang, L., Dai, W., Shu, J., Wang, J., Pei, Q., Chen, Q., Liu, X., Liu, F., Ai, H., Chen, Z., & Zhang, K. (2026). Rollout-Training Co-Design for Efficient LLM-Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2602.09578

Kandpal, M., Goswami, V., Pritwani, Y., Barik, R. K., & Saikia, M. J. (2024). BS-GeoEduNet 1.0: Blockchain-Assisted Serverless Framework for Geospatial Educational Information Networks. Isprs International Journal of Geo-Information, 13(8), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13080274

Kelliher, J. M., Xu, Y., Flynn, M., Babinski, M., Canon, S., Cavanna, E., Clum, A., Corilo, Y., Fujimoto, G. M., Giberson, C. M., Johnson, L., Li, K., Li, P. E., Li, V. C., Lo, C. C., Lynch, W., Piehowski, P., Prime, K., Purvine, S., . . . Chain, P. (2024). Standardized and Accessible Multi-Omics Bioinformatics Workflows Through the NMDC EDGE Resource. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 23, 3575-3583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2024.09.018

Malleni, S. S., Sevilla, R., Vasilevskii, A. G., Lema, J. C., & Bauer, A. (2026). Evaluating Kubernetes Performance for GenAI Inference: From Automatic Speech Recognition to LLM Summarization. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2602.04900

Malvankar, A., Villard, L., & Abdi, M. (2026). WVA: A Global Optimization Control Plane for LLMD. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2603.09730

Mantha, P., Kiwit, F. J., Saurabh, N., Jha, S., & Luckow, A. (2026). Hybrid Quantum-HPC Middleware Systems for Adaptive Resource, Workload and Task Management. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2604.03445

Romanov, S., Siqueira, A. S., Bruin, J. D., Teijema, J. J., Hofstee, L., & Schoot, R. v. d. (2023). Optimizing ASReview Simulations: A Generic Multiprocessing Solution for 'Light-Data' and 'Heavy-Data' Users. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mh4vt

S., P. (2024). Orchestration Workflows in Distributed Systems: A Systematic Analysis of Efficiency Optimization and Service Coordination. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.30191

Shen, J. (2025). FlowMesh: A Service Fabric for Composable LLM Workflows. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.26913

Singh, A. (2026). Advance Microservices-Based Approach for Distributed Version Control Processing Using the Sensor-Generated Data by IoT Devices. Premier Journal of Science. https://doi.org/10.70389/pjs.100216

Taleb, T., Boudi, A., Rosa, L., Cordeiro, L., Θεοδωρόπουλος, Θ., Tserpes, K., Dazzi, P., Protopsaltis, A., & Li, R. (2023). Toward Supporting XR Services: Architecture and Enablers. Ieee Internet of Things Journal, 10(4), 3567-3586. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2022.3222103

Thajchayapong, P. (2025). Evolution of A4L: A Data Architecture for AI-Augmented Learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2511.11877

Xiao, B. (2026). ARL-Tangram: Unleash the Resource Efficiency in Agentic Reinforcement Learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2603.13019

Zeydan, E., & Mangues‐Bafalluy, J. (2022). Recent Advances in Data Engineering for Networking. IEEE Access, 10, 34449-34496. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3162863

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Submitted

2026-02-19

Revised

2026-06-08

Accepted

2026-06-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ravanesh, M., & Roghanian, E. (2026). Integrated Queue Management and Service Composition for Enhancing Manufacturing-as-a-Service Performance. Journal of Resource Management and Decision Engineering, 1-12. https://journalrmde.com/index.php/jrmde/article/view/359

Similar Articles

1-10 of 204

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.